Building upwards: funding works by selling development rights
Some buildings fund their façade and their lift with no call for funds. They sell their roof.
A building needs a new roof, façade insulation and a modernised lift. The total far exceeds what owners can absorb. In dense cities another route exists: selling the right to build one or more additional storeys.
The operation is complex and slow, but it has a feature no other structure offers: it brings money into the association instead of asking for it.
The principle
The ground and the roof are common areas; the right to build above therefore belongs to the association. It can transfer that right to a developer, who builds new homes and becomes an owner in turn.
- The proceeds go to the association and fund the works decided.
- New units are created with their shares, redistributing the allocation.
- The building rules and the schedule of division are amended.
- Future charges are then shared across a larger number of units.
That last point is often the decisive argument: at constant charges, more units means a smaller individual share. The mechanism is explained in ownership shares.
Feasibility, above all
No extension is possible without two cumulative conditions: local planning rules must allow it, and the existing structure must be able to carry the added storeys. Both checks precede any discussion at a meeting.
They have a cost — a planning study, a structural study — but nothing compared with a project launched then abandoned. Same preparation logic as in survey or works plan.
What the law protects
The decision belongs to the general meeting, at a high majority given what it changes. It also carries its own protection: top-floor owners hold a priority right, designed to preserve their particular situation — view, light, quiet.
This point is central in discussions: an extension affects the top floors far more than the others, and a project that ignores it meets legitimate and lasting opposition.
What the board must pin down
- The duration of the works and its consequences: access, noise, scaffolding, lift.
- Liability for damage caused to the existing building during the works.
- A prior photographic record of the building, essential in any later dispute.
- Coordination with the funded works: carry them out at the same time, not after.
- The developer’s guarantees and the strength of its financial structure.
The fourth point changes the operation’s real return: sharing the scaffolding between the extension and the façade renovation saves a considerable share of the budget. See also works handover.
An extension is not judged on the price of the development right, but on the works it funds without a call for funds.
Track the project with CoproHarmony
CoproHarmony keeps studies, offers, meeting decisions and the photographic record, from first contact to handover. Create your free space.
Manage your condo association board in perfect harmony
Centralize issues, general meetings, votes, and documents. Free to start, no credit card required.
Create my space for freeYou might also like
Energy renovation grants: what the board must prepare
The leading cause of a lost subsidy is not a rejected file: it is the quote signed before the file was filed.
Common-area lighting: where the saving is immediate
A permanently lit corridor costs money every night of the year. It is the one charge line you can divide without touching the building.
Replacing the collective boiler: the options and what they involve
A collective boiler is replaced in three months when it was prepared, and in three panicked weeks when it dies in January.