Modernising a lift: what the board should examine before voting

Often the second-largest works item in a building. And the only one whose downtime cuts some residents off from their home.

A lift lasts a long time, but not forever. Past a certain age breakdowns cluster, parts get hard to find, response times stretch and maintenance costs climb without the service improving. Then comes the question: repair again, modernise, or replace?

It is a heavy, expensive decision whose consequences are lived daily during the works. The board’s role is to prepare it enough that the meeting decides on comparable material, not on a single quote produced in the room.

Signals that open the file

• A breakdown frequency rising year on year — quantify it from the intervention reports.
• Downtime measured in days rather than hours, for want of parts.
• Repeated reservations in periodic inspection reports.
• Maintenance costs rising faster than inflation.
• Comfort or levelling accuracy that has become a problem for older residents.

This material already exists: it is in the intervention and inspection reports the manager holds. Asking for it is step one, as with any contractor follow-up.

Partial refurbishment or full replacement

The price gap is considerable, and the right answer depends on the state of the shaft, the machinery and the control panel, not on preference. A partial modernisation — controls, doors, car — can extend the installation by many years at a far lower cost.

The decisive point is the independence of whoever advises. A lift company pricing the replacement of its own equipment is not best placed to recommend a refurbishment. On a file this size, an independent technical opinion pays for itself.

Questions for every bidder

• Exact downtime, and any periods of partial service.
• What is planned for residents with reduced mobility during the works.
• The fate of the landing doors: kept, refurbished or replaced?
• Making good masonry, paint and floors, often outside the quote.
• How long spare parts will remain available after installation.
• The maintenance cost after the works — routinely forgotten in comparisons.

That last point is essential: cheaper equipment with dearer maintenance can cost more over ten years. The method is in comparing quotes with confidence.

The maintenance contract, before and after

Many buildings discover on this occasion what their contract really covers. A basic contract covers periodic visits and adjustments; an extended one includes costly parts. The gap in real invoices between the two is spectacular.

Use the project to re-tender that contract, exactly as with the management contract: this is when the building has the most leverage.

Funding and carrying the decision

Lift works are shared under particular rules, since not every unit benefits equally. It is one of the rare costs where a ground-floor owner may legitimately contest their share: anticipate the question rather than discover it in the room.

Then present funding as costed scenarios per unit: see funding major works.

A lift’s real cost is not on the installation quote, but on the maintenance contract for the ten years that follow.

Track the file with CoproHarmony

CoproHarmony keeps breakdown history, inspection reports, quotes and meeting decisions in one place, from first report to completion. Create your free space.