Exclusive use of a garden or terrace: what it actually allows
A garden you have exclusive use of does not belong to you. The whole difficulty sits in that sentence.
A ground floor with a garden, a terrace reached from a single flat, a courtyard one unit uses: these are common situations and almost always misunderstood. The occupant believes they own the space; they hold only exclusive use of it.
The distinction is not theoretical: it decides what may be planted, built or altered, and who pays for what. It is one of the subjects that reaches boards most often.
A common area with reserved use
An exclusive use right applies to a common area: the ground remains the property of all owners, but its use is reserved to one unit. The right attaches to the unit, not the person: it passes on with a sale.
- It usually appears in the building rules, or results from a meeting decision.
- It may be permanent or granted for a fixed period.
- It may carry a financial consideration payable to the association.
- It is not a sale: the area still counts as common and creates no additional shares.
That last point triggers the most debate at meetings: see how ownership shares work.
What the occupant may do
In practice, everything falling under use and routine upkeep: maintaining, mowing, planting as the rules allow, placing unfixed garden furniture and movable planters.
These have one thing in common: they are reversible and alter neither the ground, the structure, nor the building’s external appearance.
What requires the meeting’s approval
- Pouring a concrete terrace, laying tiles or permanently changing the ground surface.
- Erecting a shed, a conservatory, a fixed pergola or any permanent structure.
- Installing a fence, wall or screening hedge where there was none.
- Cutting through a façade wall to create direct access from the flat.
- Felling a tree, including one planted within the exclusive-use area.
These affect a common area and follow the same regime as works affecting common areas. A structure built without approval may have to be removed, even years later.
Who pays for upkeep
The second source of conflict. Routine upkeep — mowing, pruning, cleanliness — generally falls to the beneficiary, who has exclusive use. Structural matters remain with the association.
The classic case is a terrace: the occupant maintains the surface, but the waterproofing protecting the flat below stays a common area. A defect there falls to the association — see damp and ingress and balconies and railings.
What the board should check
Three points prevent most disputes: is the right established by a written document, and which one? Do the installations match what was approved? Are upkeep obligations met, in particular pruning and drainage?
These belong in the annual walk-through, with dated photographs. A structure spotted in its first year is far easier to regularise.
Exclusive use grants the use of the ground, never its ownership: which is why whatever is built on it belongs to the meeting.
Document approvals with CoproHarmony
CoproHarmony records installation requests, meeting decisions and before-and-after photos, unit by unit, so you can find later what was approved and on what terms. Create your free space.
Manage your condo association board in perfect harmony
Centralize issues, general meetings, votes, and documents. Free to start, no credit card required.
Create my space for freeYou might also like
Tendering: the two thresholds your meeting may have forgotten to vote
Two resolutions, voted once, decide everything the manager may commit without asking you, for years.
Delegating powers to the board: how far, and on what terms
A well-drafted delegation saves three extraordinary meetings a year. A vague one produces a voidable decision and an exposed board member.
Selling a common area: the lodge, the loft, a disused room
A disused room earns nothing and costs upkeep. Selling it is possible — but it is the heaviest file a building can assemble.